I’m really happy that we were able to meet up yesterday and enjoy a show together.
Because of this play, for me, Hwang isn’t on some sort of pedestal anymore. He’s vulnerable and can make fun of himself. I’m sure we all can relate. He’s a guy who reveres yet pokes his dad and feels an exasperated affection towards him. Children of immigrants relate.


Before the NYU security guards came in, everybody in the shop was of asian descent. Coincidence?



Hyuncher mentioned that she thought Marcus’ character, an imaginary creation of narrator D.H. Hwang, was a trite literary device. I thought it was absolutely necessary.
My reasoning is too long, but in broad strokes, it is as follows:
1) Yellowface – Hwang needed a character like Marcus, a white person with yellowface, someone who “puts butter on the rice” to set up/juxtapose against the personal part of his story (second half of play)—esteemed Asian American playwright with his own yellowface, buying into the hype of what he’s supposed to represent.
2) At one point, while writing the play, I imagine Hwang looking over Marcus’ character and seeing that although he needs him, he’s written him with a bit too much cheese. The e-mail correspondences from China with that music in the background that is supposed to represent daga music from dong country were nacho.
So Hwang had to set up the scene where he exposes Marcus in a candid self-deprecating way to forgive the cheese. I’m glad he did because otherwise the correspondences from Marcus would have been blemishes on a great play.
4 comments:
hey! didn't we say that anyone EXCEPT kfc could recap the nite? jk. you are allowed because your image fishing always leads to fun results. the cops on segways image is very hilarious.
anyway, i said that marcus trying to challenge his creator was the overused device of late. not the use of marcus's character (the white guy) in general. and wasn't his visit to the dong country supposed to poke fun a little bit at the foreigner abroad, there to "find" himself? or maybe that's my cynical take. either way, it was a good play. but not GREAT. lars was better.
"anyway, i said that marcus trying to challenge his creator was the overused device of late."
When put this way, I feel as though I agree but should disagree. And I don't think I'm just being contrarian.
Lars challenging his imagination through his rejection of Victoria?
Any other examples?
Maybe it's because I saw Frankenstein a few weeks ago that I feel this device is overused, but at the same time, the fact that it was written by Mary Shelley in the 19th century makes me think there is some time cushion.
Is he still married to that lady? She looks old. Which means DHH's headshot must be reeaaally old. Unless she's a cougar.
I'm sure his headshot is at least 10 years old.
And if by "cougar" you mean a woman in her sexual prime who prefers to hunt rather than be hunted, then yes.
Post a Comment